True/False: When reading an intervention study, it is often best to read through the results first.

True/False: When reading an intervention study, it is often best to read through the results first.

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Sometimes
• D. Not specified

Answer: (A)

When evaluating an intervention study, you want to quickly grasp what happened before digging into how it happened. Reading the results first gives you immediate access to the actual effects—direction, magnitude, and whether the findings reached statistical significance—so you can judge whether the intervention seems to have a meaningful impact and whether the study is worth deeper scrutiny. If the results look important, you then examine the methods to assess validity, such as study design, randomization, blinding, and potential biases, which helps you weigh confidence in the findings. This results-first approach is a practical, time-efficient way to decide what to focus on next and whether the study warrants full appraisal.

When evaluating an intervention study, you want to quickly grasp what happened before digging into how it happened. Reading the results first gives you immediate access to the actual effects—direction, magnitude, and whether the findings reached statistical significance—so you can judge whether the intervention seems to have a meaningful impact and whether the study is worth deeper scrutiny. If the results look important, you then examine the methods to assess validity, such as study design, randomization, blinding, and potential biases, which helps you weigh confidence in the findings. This results-first approach is a practical, time-efficient way to decide what to focus on next and whether the study warrants full appraisal.